THE PASSPORT PRIVILEGE - MALAYSIA

THE PASSPORT PRIVILEGE

1.And now Najib’s censorship will be exported. Foreign media must be put under control the way the Malaysian media is controlled. All reports must be in praise of 1MDB, Petro Saudi, Cayman Islands, British Virgin Island, the 2.6 billion Ringgit in Najib’s private account, the 2.3 billion Ringgit which has been returned, the sacking of party members and leaders who failed to praise all the above etc. etc. etc.

2.How is the foreign censorship and control to be done. Simple. The passports are a privilege. Deprive Malaysians of this privilege.

3.Take away their passports if they fail to praise Najib when speaking to the foreign media. It is totally and absolutely the democratic thing to do. All democracies in the world take away the passports of their citizens if they tell the foreign media anything bad about their leaders. Malaysians, under Najib’s democracy must do the same.

4.I will begin and I will set the example by praising Najib and the 2.6 billion Ringgit in his account sky-high when abroad. Any speech I deliver abroad and my answers in any interview by foreign media will highlight Najib’s democratic arrest and detention of anyone who failed to report to the police about Najib’s action to secure the country by declaring his critics are terrorists. I will never fail to talk about Najib’s great contribution to Islam for which the Arabs gave him USD 681 million. Also about the freedom of speech of UMNO delegates to not talk about 1MDB and the 2.6 billion Ringgit in the great leader’s account.

5.The passport is a privilege. It says so in the Malaysian constitution. The constitution and the law also says that if you don’t praise Najib, the passport will be confiscated.

6.When I am abroad I will defend Najib and his democratic Government. I give my word that I (with my tongue in cheek) will do so.

7.Three cheers for 1 MDB and money in the PM’s pocket.

8.Now the country will become a big prison for those who talk against Najib to the foreign media when abroad.

Credit : chedet.cc

Read More

BETRAYING UMNO - Malaysia

BETRAYING UMNO

MALAYSIA

1. Indeed, what is happening to this blessed country has never been anticipated, dreamed or predicted by anyone, whether its citizen or foreigners.

2. When we fought for independence all leaders and people believed that leaders chosen by them will behave and act as nationalists who served, even sacrificed for the sake of country, for the people and for their prosperity. This is why they accepted without question the democratic system, a system that gives citizens the right to choose their government.

3. And as they anticipated, their choice of leaders after leaders did not disappoint them. The nation was properly developed and people enjoy a better life and are more prosperous than before.

4. Prime Ministers did not posed any problems. When the time came for them back down, off they go. Civil unrest to topple the Prime Minister has never happened.

5. Tun Abdullah also stepped down when his performance in the 12th General Election was not so good. He withdrew when it was clear that he no longer had people’s support. Najib also urged him to step down, and Najib replaced him.

6. People felt relieved. This is Malaysia. The transition of leadership at the highest level of power occurred smoothly and orderly. People waited for favours that they will get from the new leadership. They believed that the new is better than the old. If not better then certainly at least equal to his father, Tun Razak.

7. But people aspirations did not come true. Very early it can be observed his remarkable life of luxury compared to the previous Prime Ministers. This is seen especially during the wedding of his child. The focus is not given to the country’s development, to the creation of jobs and business opportunities. On the other hand BRIM was created, giving RM500 to people who are said to be poor.

8. People are disappointed. Far from supporting. Najib’s performance in the 13th General Election declined compared to the Prime Minister that he replaced. But the leaders at the divisional level and especially UMNO’s elected representatives did not seem to understand the lack of public support for Najib.

9. Then came 1MDB. With a capital of one million ringgit the company, founded and headed by Najib, borrowed forty-two thousand times more than capital. Thus started the stories about misconduct by 1MDB. Billions of ringgit were invested without in-depth studies, transferred here and there, disappeared and lost. Questions remained unanswered. Interests obligations are not met. Auditors are dismissed, replaced and dismissed again.

10. Then there is the story of Jho Low who does not hold any position but was full of authority.. If Members of the Board question, Jho Low would telephone Dato Sri Najib and tell the director asked Najib himself. Directors do not ask. Just follow instructions from Jho Low. Those who are not happy withdrew from the Board.

11. Stories about Rosmah also angered the people. Stories spread regarding the purchase of handbags alone costing millions of Ringgit, and also supposedly of many businesses giving free shares to Rosmah through her proxy.

12. All matters regarding 1MDB are sealed, not reported by the press because they are not allowed to, or out of fear or were warned. 1MDB matters were also not allowed to be brought up during UMNO General Meeting.

13. Later in the foreign press, Wall Street Journal, there were reports that Dato Sri Najib has in his personal bank account USD681, equivalent to RM2.6 billion. Everyone was surprised. They asked whether it was true that the Prime Minister of Malaysia have that much money. This is not possible. This is just news from the foreign press who like to criticize Malaysia.

14. Najib denied. He said he would never be so stupid as to deposit that amount of money into his personal account. He said the story is unfounded. He did not have so much money.

15. But in the end Dato Sri Najib admitted that there is a sum of RM2.6 billion in his personal account. Supposedly, a donation from a Prince of Saudi Arabia. Then changed, that it was from the King of Saudi Arabia who had died.

16. But its confirmation by means of a reliable document does not exist. Just a declaration by Najib. The Attorney General was dismissed and the new one appointed claimed that Najib had not misused funds in his account. Apparently this money has been given back to the donor. Once again there are no documents to support this contention. Only a statement by the Attorney General

17. If not guilty, why not file a defamation suit against the Wall Street Journal and Sarawak Report that made the reports on the RM2.6 billion in Najib’s account. The suits can be filed in Britain or the United States if the accused refuses to be tried in Malaysia. But Najib did not file the suit, other than just asking why the reports were made. This means that reports by the Wall Street Journal and Sarawak Report are true and with basis.

18. Now the world knows and believe that Najib has misappropriated a lot of 1MDB’s capital. And the world laughs sarcastically at Malaysia which have become the most corrupt country in the world. And Najib is allegedly the worst Finance Minister in Asia.

19. Heads of UMNO’s divisions and UMNO Members of the House of Representatives could not be so deaf and blind as to not know about Najib’s misconduct. But they continue to support Najib and defend him. Do not they feel any shame knowing their Prime Minister is this rotten, openly humiliated by the world without being rebutted by Najib.

20. But it seems they do not feel ashamed and are more concerned with self-interest rather than the interests and dignity of the country.

21. Everywhere people gather and demanded that Najib be removed from the post of Prime Minister. Members and UMNO leaders do not know that their party will lose if Najib continues to lead the BN and Umno in the 14th General Election. Only the dumb and deaf will not be bothered with the demise of Umno which will surely happened.

22. Umno is a party that defeated the Malayan Union and liberate the country. UMNO also succeeded in developing the country.

23. UMNO also gave to the country Prime Ministers, Prime Ministers that developed the country to a high level.

24. But today because UMNO defends Najib as Prime Minister although it is clear he was involved in a deplorable scandal, and makes UMNO the worst party in Malaysia, still division leaders and UMNO Members of Parliament conspire with Najib to destroy UMNO. Their children and grandchildren will curse them for this.

25. O UMNO leaders, please remember the future. Your betrayal will be justly commensurated in the world and in the hereafter.

Credit : chedet.cc

Read More

THE CITIZENS’ DECLARATION - MALAYSIA

1. Malaysia is a Constitutional Monarchy and a Parliamentary Democracy.

2. The country has a written constitution and laws to protect the people from criminal acts and abuses of power by the Government.

3. Unfortunately we are seeing the Constitution and the laws of the country being ignored or abused. The built-in constitutional provision for redress i.e the report to the police and the vote of non-confidence to remove the leader are now no longer available.

4. The separation of power between the Legislative, the Executive and the Judiciary is not respected any more. The Prime Minister seems to exercise power over all three. As a result he seems to be above the laws of the country.

5. He created a national wealth fund from borrowed money.

6. Now the Government is in debt totalling RM50 billion.

7. 1MDB is unable to pay a two billion dollar interest on the debt.

8. 1MDB defaulted on the payment of another debt. 1MDB invested one billion dollars in JV with Petro Saudi, supposedly to exploit oil and gas concessions in Argentina and Turkmenistan.

9. The JV was dissolved as there was no oil or gas to produce.

10. The USD 1 billion share in the JV was lent or sold to Petro Saudi for 1.2 billion.

11. More money was lent to Petro Saudi.

12. Where the money has gone to is not known.

13. More than 2 billion USD was invested in Cayman Islands.

14. The money was said to have been brought back and deposited in a Singapore bank.

15. The Singapore bank denies money had been deposited with it by 1MDB.

16. 1MDB then claims it was not money, but units. What unit?

17. Suddenly Najib was reported to have USD 681 million (equal to RM 2.6 billion) in his private account in Ambank.

18. He claims it was a donation but has no credible document to prove it.

19. He had spent some of the money held in this account on himself.

20. There is no record of his spending on UMNO in the 13th General Election as he claims.

21. Reports by Bank Negara apparently on this account has been brushed aside by the newly appointed Attorney General.

22. There are many more things done by Najib which require police investigations together with other Government agencies under the law.

23. All these investigations cannot be done because they are stopped by Najib as Prime Minister.

24. In fact all avenues for redress are now not available to the citizens of Malaysia.

25. These are extraordinary circumstances and resort has got to be made through extraordinary means.

26. Hence the Citizens’ Declaration on saving Malaysia and the appeal to the Rulers to intervene.

27. Although there is no provision for the Rulers to intervene, nevertheless there are ways and means for the Rulers to save the country from the abuses of power by Prime Minister Najib.

28. The people look up to the Rulers to save Malaysia.

29. I am sure the Rulers will not fail them.

Credit :chedet.cc

Read More

HOW TO BRIBE GOVERNMENT

MALAYSIA

17 May 2016 | Economics

1. The Governments of nations dedicated to increasing the wealth of their countries realised the importance of international trade. This is especially so after the loss of the European Empires during which a policy of Imperial Preference ensured the monopoly of imports and exports from and to the colonial territories.

2. The greatest of these imperialist countries was Britain. It became the richest and the most powerful country in the world.

3. But after WWII the imperialists of Europe lost their empires and the trade monopoly that they enjoyed. Strong competition from East Asian countries reduced their trade even more.

4. But they still enjoy good incomes from selling arms. To generate more exports of arms they need to have proxy wars being fought by unsuspecting countries, particularly between the countries they created during their imperial heydays.

5. We see today very sophisticated arms being used in the fratricidal wars, which are being fought in a number of Arab ex-colonies. There is no way for these countries to develop and produce such sophisticated weapons. They may produce primitive bombs and rockets. But the tanks, armoured cars, machine guns and missiles must be bought from the developed countries.

6. These developed countries decry the arms trade as a business. But there can be no doubt that they are the ones most involved in the trade.

7. The weapons trade is huge. The warplanes, tanks, warships, rockets, missiles, submarines etc cost billions of dollars. The income from the sale of arms can contribute much to the wealth creation of a country.

8. They are therefore not too choosy as to who they sell their arms to. Their customers may be oppressive dictators and corrupt Prime Ministers. They may condemn these people for not being democratic and oppressive. But they would tone down their criticisms if these people offer to buy expensive arms from them.

9. The moaning and decrying over the injustices and oppression of dictators are just side-shows to assuage their conscience. But it is they who promote corruption and dictatorial oppression of many Governments in the world.

Credit: chedet.cc

Read More

PM DITEGUR OLEH TUN DR.MAHATHIR

Teguran ini merupakan salinan dari blog Tun.Dr Mahathir sendiri.

TEGURAN

1. Ada orang yang memberitahu kepada Dato Seri Najib Tun Razak yang saya telah memburukkan pemerintahannya.

2. Saya tidak akan menyangkal kerana saya telah berkali-kali menegur dasar-dasar Kerajaan sekarang.

3. Saya menegur kerana saya berpendapat pemimpin yang tidak ditegur akan percaya segala-gala yang dilakukan oleh mereka baik-baik belaka. Hanya apabila ditegur sahaja barulah pemimpin akan sedar akan kesalahan dan mungkin akan memperbetulkannya.

4. Izinkan saya mencerita cerita dongeng berkenaan seorang raja Inggeris. Ia dikelilingi dengan ramai dato-dato yang mendakwa dia adalah seorang raja yang amat berkuasa keatas segala-galanya. Demikian pasang-surut air di laut pun akan patuh kepada perintahnya.

5 Alkesah, maka pada satu hari raja menitah untuk meletakkan takhtanya di pantai menghadapi laut.

6. Air sedang pasang dan raja bertanya kepada dato-datonya apakah baginda boleh hentikan air pasang supaya tidak basahkan kakinya.

7. Jawab mereka, “Ya, Tuanku. Air tidak akan sampai kaki Tuanku.”

8. Maka raja pun menitah supaya air laut itu tidak naik lagi.

9. Tetapi air laut itu terus pasang dan kena pada kaki baginda. Maka baginda pun murka kepada dato-datonya.
Demikianlah sikap dato-dato kerana ingin menyenangkan hati raja mereka.

10. Satu lagi cerita dongeng juga ialah berkenaan dato-dato istana yang tidak pernah menegur raja. Mereka sepanjang masa mengiyakan saja apa juga yang dilakukan oleh raja.
11. Satu hari raja masuk dewan dalam keadaan bogel. Baginda bertanya cantikkah pakaiannya. Semua angguk kepala dan berkata “Ya Tuanku”.

12. Hanya seorang budak yang berkata, “Tuanku bogel.”

13. Maka raja pun murka akan dato-datonya yang tidak berkata yang benar apabila dia bogel.

14. Kita boleh dapat sedikit pelajaran dari cerita-cerita dongeng ini.

15. Orang Melayu mempunyai banyak pepatah yang boleh jadi panduan dalam kehidupan mereka. Antaranya ingin saya sebut disini:
“Sayangkan anak tangan-tangankan
Sayangkan isteri tinggal-tinggalkan”
Dengan izin saya ingin menambah sedikit kepada pepatah ini.
“Sayangkan pemimpin tegur-tegurkan”

16. Saya lihat bagaimana orang Melayu tidak mudah menegur pemimpin. Walaupun pemimpin jelas bersalah, tidak ada siapa yang sanggup menegur secara terbuka. Tetapi di belakang pemimpin mereka akan keluarkan kata-kata yang kesat terhadapnya.

17. Mungkin saya berbeza sedikit dari Melayu lain. Apabila YTM Tunku membuat beberapa dasar dan tindakan yang tidak disenangi oleh ramai orang Melayu, saya menulis surat menegur Tunku.

18. Walaupun kerananya saya dipecat, tetapi YTM Tunku meletak jawatan sebagai Perdana Menteri. Mungkin bukan kerana teguran saya, tetapi hakikatnya Tunku mengundur diri.

19. Demikian juga dengan Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi. Mungkin kerana teguran, mungkin kerana prestasi buruk Pilihanraya ke 12. Tetapi hakikatnya Tun Abdullah juga letak jawatan.

20. Saya sendiri pun letak jawatan. Sebahagian dari sebabnya ialah kerana saya dengar bisik-bisik yang menyoal “Bila lagi orang tua ini akan pergi.” Saya percaya jika saya tidak letak jawatan, bisik akan jadi jeritan.

21. Pilihan saya bagi mengganti Tun Abdullah ialah Dato Seri Najib. Setelah beberapa lama dilihat bahawa dasar dan tindakan Dato Seri Najib tidak lebih berkesan dari Tun Abdullah.

22. Saya tidak sangka yang pencapaiannya dalam Pilihanraya Umum ke13 lebih buruk dari Tun Abdullah.

23. Harapan saya Dato Seri Najib akan mengambil ikhtibar dari prestasinya yang buruk dalam Pilihanraya Umum ke 13. Malangnya sehingga kini tidak ternampak apa-apa perubahan dari segi dasar atau pendekatan walaupun saya cuba menyampaikan pendapat saya, (yang juga pendapat ramai yang datang bertemu saya) secara langsung kepada Dato Seri Najib.

24. Saya tidak ada pilihan selain dari menarik balik sokongan saya. Ini pun tidak berkesan. Oleh itu terpaksalah saya menegur.

25. Apakah dianya yang saya fikir salah. Ia bermula dengan pendirian melayani semua tuntutan musuh. ISA dan undang-undang buang daerah dimansuh. Tindakan ini tidak sedikit pun mengurangkan tentangan oleh parti lawan. Sebaliknya jenayah bertambah dengan banyaknya kerana pembebasan ketua-ketua geng.

26. Demikian juga dengan sikap merendah diri kepada negara jiran sehingga urusan dalam negeri pun tertakluk kepada pendapat Kerajaan negara jiran.

27. Tetapi pendapat kaum dan parti yang kuat menyokong untuk menyelamatkan kedudukan Kerajaan tidak diberi layanan yang saksama.

28. Wang Kerajaan diguna untuk mempengaruhi sokongan rakyat apabila sahaja pilihanraya umum diadakan. Ini menjadikan rakyat terlalu bergantung kepada Kerajaan untuk segala-galanya. Bagi yang betul-betul miskin, bantuan seperti ini memanglah wajar. Tetapi beribu rakyat yang ditawar menolak bantuan wang seperti ini. Semangat rakyat untuk bekerja menjadi luntur apabila mereka diberi ganjaran tanpa apa-apa usaha oleh mereka. Semangat ini tidak akan menolong pembangunan Negara.

29. Dasar ekonomi mengutamakan tuntutan pengguna. Impot barangan digalakan dan industri tempatan diabaikan, bahkan dihalang oleh dasar Kerajaan.
30. Cuti ditambah sehingga adakalanya pekerja bercuti lebih satu minggu. Sebaliknya gaji minimum dinaikkan tanpa mengambilkira kenaikan kos yang boleh menjadi perniagaan dan perusahaan tidak bedayasaing dengan barangan impot.

31. Sesungguhnya banyaklah dasar, pendekatan dan perbuatan Kerajaan pimpinan Dato Seri Najib yang merosakkan hubungan antara kaum, merosakkan ekonomi dan kewangan negara.

32. Semua ini disebabkan penyokong Kerajaan tidak pernah menegur pemimpin.

33. Jikalau tiada siapa yang sanggup menegur, biarlah saya menegur. Saya pernah dipecat oleh Tunku Abdul Rahman, dipulau oleh Datuk Seri Abdullah dan difitnah oleh ramai. Jika kerana menegur saya akan didera, terpaksalah saya terima.

34. Bukanlah saya tidak sayang pemimpin. Tetapi saya lebih sayang bangsa dan negara saya.

Source; 

Blog TUN DR. MAHATHIR MOHAMAD

Read More

Sejarah Pembentukan Malaysia

Adakah "MALAYSIA" perlu disebut sebagai "NEGARA MALAYSIA" atau "PERSEKUTUAN MALAYSIA". Apakah yang pembaca faham dengan perbezaan panggilan ini.

Disini penulis akan cuba menerangkan setakat yang penulis faham. Perkataan Negara diperolehi apabila sebuah pemerintahan yang telah dijajah dan mendapat kemerdekaan. Dengan itu, pemerintahan itu akan dipanggil sebuah negara yang merdeka. Persekutuan pula merupakan sebuah gabungan pemerintahan yang berbeza dan bekerjasama untuk memperolehi kemerdekaan bersama~sama. Dalam kes Persekutuan Tanah Melayu, terdapat banyak kawasan yang mempunyai pemerintahan sendiri sebelum bersatu dalam satu nama untuk mendapatkan kemerdekaan. Dengan banyaknya kawasan yang mempunyai pemerintah sendiri maka terbentuklah sebuah Persekutuan Tanah Melayu iaitu gabungan beberapa pemerintahan. Dalam sejarah, Persekutuan Tanah Melayu telah merdeka pada 31 Ogos 1957 dari jajahan British.

Sarawak dan Sabah pula mempunyai pemerintahan sendiri tidak seperti Persekutuan Tanah Melayu yang mempunyai banyak kawasan yang berbeza pemerintah. Sarawak diperintah oleh keluarga Rajah Brooke iaitu satu~satunya yang memerintah Sarawak. Apabila Sarawak mendapat kemerdekaa pada 22 Julai 1963 ianya merupakan sebuah negara merdeka. Ianya dipanggil Negara Sarawak. Seperti Sarawak, Sabah juga mempunyai satu pemerintah iaitu kerajaan British yang dipanggil North Borneo. Sabah tidak mempunyai kawasan yang mempunyai pemerintah yang berasingan, tidak seperti Persekutuan Tanah Melayu. Dengan itu, apabila Sabah memperolehi kemerdekaan pada 31 Ogos 1963, Sabah merupakan sebuah negara iaitu Negara Sabah.

Disini, pembaca sepatutnya sudah faham status Persekutuan Tanah Melayu yang merdeka, Negara Sarawak dan Negara Sabah adalah sama. Masing~masing mempunyai tarikh kemerdekaannya sendiri. 

MALAYSIA? Bila masa perkataan MALAYSIA diguna pakai? Bukankah hanya ada Persekutuan Tanah Melayu, Sarawak dan Sabah (mungkin Singapura juga) Jadi, dari mana asal usul perkataan MALAYSIA ini.? MALAYSIA wujud setelah gabungan tiga(3) entiti atau tiga(3) pemerintahan yang merdeka. Dengan termeterainya Perjanjian 1963 iaitu Perjanjian 18 perkara bagi Negara Sarawak dan Perjanjian 20 perkara bagi Negara Sabah. Perjanjian ini termeterai pada 16 September 1963. Tarikh inilah barulah bermula perkataan MALAYSIA diguna pakai. Perjanjian ini bertujuan melindungi hak kedua~dua negara ini supaya tidak dicabuli oleh kerajaan Persekutuan Tanah Melayu.  Jadi, dalam penerangan ini...bilakah MALAYSIA merdeka?BILA? MALAYSIA tidak pernah merdeka? YA! MALAYSIA tidak pernah merdeka. Kerana melalui pengabungan tiga pemerintahan yang sudah sedia merdeka maka wujud lah Malaysia yang merdeka. Dalam pengabungan tiga pemerintahan ini tidak wujud perkataan "menyertai Malaysia" kerana Malaysia wujud setelah pengabungan ini dan Malaysia tidak wujud jika tiada pengabungan tiga pemerintahan ini. Masih tidak faham? Jika ya...Anda mempunyai masalah subjek sejarah atau pun anda telah lulus dengan sangat cemerlang dalam subjek sejarah.

Dalam pembelajaran di sekolah, dari sekolah rendah hingga sekolah menengah tidak terdapat penerangan yang jelas tentang Negara Sarawak dan Negara Sabah. Sejarah yang dipelajari adalah sejarah Persekutuan Tanah Melayu. Apakah tujuan sejarah Sarawak dan Sabah tidak wujud dalam buku sejarah sekolah? Siapa yang memberi arahan agar hanya sejarah Tanah Melayu yang diajar di sekolah? Kemana hilangnya sejarah Sarawak dan Sabah?

Persoalan seterusnya. Adakah Sarawak dan Sabah setaraf dengan Persekutuan Tanah Melayu. Jawapan yang mudah. YA!. Penerangan yang mudah, Sarawak atau Sabah tidak sama taraf dengan Pulau Pinang, Kedah, Pahang dan yang sewaktu dengannya. Negeri~negeri yang terbentuk di Tanah Melayu adalah di bawa naungan Persekutuan Tanah Melayu dan Persekutuan Tanah Melayu setaraf dengan Sarawak dan Sabah. Maksudnya, Sarawak dan Sabah adalah lebih besar dari semua negeri~negeri di bawa Persekutuan Tanah Melayu.

Kesimpulannya, pengabungan antara tiga pemerintahan yang merdeka MALAYSIA sepatutnya dipanggil PERSEKUTUAN  NEGARA MALAYSIA. Ini kerana tiga buah kerajaan yang merdeka dan berbeza bergabung menjadi satu. "United State Of  Malaysia" ?

Terlalu banyak persoalan yang timbul dalam kes ini. Adakah bendera Malaysia perlu dikebarkan pada setiap 31 Ogos? Bukankah hanya bendera Persekutuan Tanah Melayu dan Sabah yang patut dikebarkan? Kemana kah sudah bendera Persekutuan Tanah Melayu? HILANG?  Bukankah bendera Malaysia perlu lebih dikebarkan pada 16 September 1963? Bendera Sarawak perlu dikebarkan pada 22 Julai 1963? Kenapakah kerajaan tidak mengambil berat tentang perkara ini? Kenapa kerajaan tidak menjelaskan perkara ini? Terlalu banyak soalan dan terlalu sedikit jawapan. Adakah kerajaan perlu membiarkan generasi baru dan rakyat sendiri mencari jawapan?

Penerangan ini hanyalah melalui pengetahuan sendiri melalui sumber yang terhad. Tulisan ini hanya bertujuan untuk kita berfikir sejenak tentang perkara ini.

Read More